Paramedic in Hertfordshire says East of England Ambulance Service is in 'state of collapse'

Paramedics in Hertfordshire said the ambulance service is "in a state of collapse" as the number of 999 calls surges in the face of massive funding cuts.

Staff from the East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, who wished to remain anonymous, said patients can be left waiting up to three hours for an ambulance.

One paramedic said these included patients with chest pains, spinal injuries, and even one with symptoms of a stroke.

Figures obtained from the trust show an extra 679 heart attack patients had to wait more than half an hour to be taken to a specialist cardiac centre by ambulance in November 2012 compared to last year.

The number of patients in Hertfordshire with other injuries who had to wait more than an hour for an ambulance increased from five in December 2011, to 87 in November 2012.

Paramedics warned that with the additional pressure of winter, it was only a matter of time before someone died as a result of no ambulances being available.

One said: "There are not enough ambulances and fast response vehicles available to cope with the volume of calls. If you dial 999 in an emergency, chances are there will be no ambulance to send."

The trust is facing a £50million cut over five years, and logged a 20 per cent increase in 999 calls during 2012.

Paramedics accused the trust of attempting to plug the gap with emergency care assistants who receive basic first aid training, and fast response cars, which cannot take people to hospital.

The number of people in Hertfordshire waiting more than half an hour for an ambulance increased from 37 in December 2011, to 376 in November 2012, peaking at 427 in September.

In the East of England, the number of patients waiting more than two and a half hours for an ambulance increased from three to 15, peaking at 33 in June 2011.

One paramedic, who works in a fast response car, said: "On almost every occasion I request backup from an ambulance, I am told that there are none available, and there is a queue of outstanding 999 calls.

"This means patients are delayed in getting to hospital, and until an ambulance arrives, I cannot attend other calls."

The paramedic compiled a list of delayed jobs which include a teenager with a spinal injury, who waited 40 minutes for a fast response vehicle, and then another hour for an ambulance.

An elderly woman with symptoms of a stroke had to wait an hour to be taken to hospital, and another waited two hours for an ambulance after falling and breaking her ribs.

The paramedic added: "I can only see things becoming more dire. Someone in south Hertfordshire will die this winter as a result of no ambulance being available at the time of the emergency.

"It is not a matter of if, but when."

Another paramedic said as another consequence of the delays, ambulance crews often have to enter a hostile environment.

They said: "Verbal abuse is just accepted as part of the job, I'm surprised that the public are not complaining more."

Neil Storey, director of operations for the trust, said it was working on improving the figures by the end of this financial year.

He blamed the increase in figures on a new reporting system and a rise in calls to the service.

One of the paramedics added: "The figures are there in black and white and still our senior managers are not accepting that there is a problem.

"My colleagues feel they are forced to play Russian roulette with people's lives as the work load increases.

"I don't think the people of south west Hertfordshire are aware that the service is in such state of collapse until they call upon it for help.

"I joined to help people, not to see them suffer at the hands of a failing ambulance service."

Comments(20)

The Rover says...
1:57pm Fri 4 Jan 13

Once when visiting A&E at Watford General I was told by the reception that I would get seen quicker if I go back home, dial 999 and come in by Ambulance. No wonder the ambulance service is hard pushed if the hospital is giving such ridiculous advice. It does seem to be common knowledge that you get seen quicker if you call an Ambulance, rather than turn up at A&E

Reader (R) says...
2:09pm Fri 4 Jan 13

The East of England Ambulance Service will always have problems because of the way they choose to operate.

The majority of emergency calls that originate in Borehamwood are dealt with by the ambulance station in Colonial Way, Watford.

They will never reach the target attendance time and will continue to rack up costs because of the distance travelled. On top of that it will then depend on which A&E it transport the patient to...either Barnet or Watford. If Barnet is involved then that crew have a greater "down time" than a crew clearing at Watford Gen.

Borehamwood needs to have a larger static presence with a floating fast response car to cover Borehamwood,Radlett, Elstree and Bushey.

Stop thinking about cost and start concentrating on people!

Sara says...
2:12pm Fri 4 Jan 13

Indeed that was the advice I was given three years ago when my GP referred me to the Acute Admissions Unit. I felt it was a waste of an ambulance when my husband was able to return home from work to take me into Watford General.

OAC Bailiff says...
2:54pm Fri 4 Jan 13

all 3 services should be exempt from cuts ambulance firebrigade and police you cant mess around with peoples lives its now getting a bit ridiculous

OAC Bailiff says...
2:55pm Fri 4 Jan 13

well said reader r

Uneek says...
3:41pm Fri 4 Jan 13

All patients are seen in order of how life threatening their condition is when they arrive at an A&E dept, there method of arrival has no baring on how quickly they are seen. If that was the case a cut hand arriving by ambulance would be seen quicker than someone having a heart attack arriving by car!
As for the comment about borehamwood needing more cover they already have an ambulance and a response car based at the fire station 24/7

garston tony says...
3:53pm Fri 4 Jan 13

You may be seen sooner if you call an ambulance but only in the sense a paramedic would assess you and give you basic help. You may get a lift to to a&e but if its not a priority illness/injury you'll still have to wait for the more urgent cases to be dealt with.

But in principle people should not waste ambulance (or any emergency services time) but the funding I agree should not be cut so as to compromise peoples safety

Reader (R) says...
4:00pm Fri 4 Jan 13

"As for the comment about borehamwood needing more cover they already have an ambulance and a response car based at the fire station 24/7”

Yes and you still have a procession of ambulances racing from Watford to Borehamwood throughout a 24hr cycle.

Two have gone through within the past 30 minutes sirens blaring!

FatManonaBike says...
4:55pm Fri 4 Jan 13

What is utterly apparent here is that consideration has not been give, either by the Watford Observer, the author of the article, the whistleblowing Paramedic, or the commentators, that the issues are considerably deeper than "the ambulance services can't cope".

Closure of the Accident and Emergency departments in Welwyn Garden City and Hemel Hempstead have resulted in a MASSIVE increase of patients arriving at an already-overstretche
d Watford General. Ambulances can't offload their patients and, therefore, can't go back out.

If A&E services were adequate, the number of ambulances would be able to cope with call demand. However, for A&E services to be adequate, other hospital services have to be similarly prepared. This is a fundamental failure of the NHS throughout, and not solely a problem with the ambulance services.

I know. I'm on the front line, too.

Uneek says...
5:01pm Fri 4 Jan 13

The delays in ambulances attending calls are sometimes due to waiting to off load at Watford general but not always, a lot of the time it's due to resources not matching demand.

FatManonaBike says...
5:18pm Fri 4 Jan 13

Uneek wrote:
The delays in ambulances attending calls are sometimes due to waiting to off load at Watford general but not always, a lot of the time it's due to resources not matching demand.
This is because they are waiting for, literally, HOURS to offload at Watford General.

theturpster says...
5:28pm Fri 4 Jan 13

Lets remember that the majority of frontline NHS staff are brilliant at the job under stressful circumstances. Let's ensure this thread doesn't enter a generic NHS bashing competition.

Mohandas says...
10:13am Sat 5 Jan 13

I agree with you theturpster but yery worrying that "Verbal abuse is just accepted as part of the job, I'm surprised that the public are not complaining more." But I strongly believe that whistle blowers need greater protection in both private & public sectors. The often daily fraudalent reports Joe Bloggs receive about how excellent things are, has reached epidemic proportions. It's the ordinary worker who suffers every time whilst mangement massage the target figures.

Uneek says...
10:25am Sat 5 Jan 13

This is not about the frontline workers who are working extremely hard in difficult circumstances, the root of this is poor management at senior levels where the decisions are being made about service delivery.

miwe2 says...
6:44pm Sat 5 Jan 13

No sympathy. I have not forgotten my son's last encounter with the ambulance service yet.

jimbo0900 says...
11:20am Sun 6 Jan 13

Demand for NHS services are higher than ever, particularly A&E and the ambulance service. This may be down to the fact that we have and aeging population with complex health needs but the simple fact is that the current government are stripping away the NHS. The only A&E departments in Hertforshire are Watford and Stevenage.

Also, we live in a society where people take what they can get. Too many people see 999 as an 'entitlement' rather than a service designed to intervene in genuine emergencies

garston tony says...
9:27am Mon 7 Jan 13

theturpster wrote:
Lets remember that the majority of frontline NHS staff are brilliant at the job under stressful circumstances. Let's ensure this thread doesn't enter a generic NHS bashing competition.
Id second this point, this isnt about attacking those on the front line but an issue with how much resources there are and how they are managed which is down to the government, local health care trust and management. NOT the ambulance crews, nurses, doctors etc who I think do a on the whole wonderful job given the circumstances

the_mofo says...
7:52pm Mon 7 Jan 13

I ( often due to my own clumsiness ) have been into A&E so many times that i deserve a gold card.
I have also ( touch wood) only needed an ambulance twice.
I could not have more compliments to the frontline staff of the Hospital and the South East England Ambulance service.
Every single time I've been, i've been treated with respect, and sometimes, even quite quickly.
I have seen the grief the poor people have to upt up with. Abusive patients and service users.

I used to work for the NHS, as have all my family, and my mother is an A&E nurse. We have all worked in A&E and have seen these emergency responders given little support, more stress, and even boarderline contempt by their line managers the middle management.

We are all struggling with budget cuts, and I think the front-liners have worked wonders. They go above and beyond to meet targets, and then these limits are treated as the lowest standard for the next targets.



When you put your objective hat on, and have a reasonable expectation of them. They exceed your expectations.

Well done to the whistle blower, well done to the staff.

Su Murray says...
12:33am Tue 8 Jan 13

In all professions and trades, you will find, the good, the bad, and the indifferent. Front line NHS staff, have in the last couple of years been dealing with increasingly difficult circumstances. That they mostly strive so hard to provide a caring, comprehensive service, against the odds, is a testament to their dedication.

Back in July, I was a member of a delegation that took a 'happy birthday NHS' cake to Watford General. Whilst I'm sure the staff and patients enjoyed the cake, what the staff really appreciated was the fact we were acknowledging their efforts.

As a Nation, we created the NHS during a time of hardship and limited funds. But not limited vision. The Conservative party have always been against the NHS and despite David Cameron's promises prior to the May 2010 election, nothing has changed. We mustn't let them destroy what is a jewel in our National crown.

garston tony says...
10:06am Tue 8 Jan 13

Part of the problem is the way the PCTs are set up and managed, there were plenty of issues well before the conservatives came into power so whilst things can be better now Labour cant be absolved of blame for the current situation which with their policies helped to created

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree