News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


St Albans taxpayers deserve an answer over laptop theft


“SORRY” seems to be the easiest word at St Albans District Council at the moment.

A few weeks ago an apology swiftly followed the Review’s article which revealed that parking tickets issued by the district council since March were invalid due to an administration error.

And this week the council’s chief executive Daniel Goodwin was forced to apologise again after the Review reported that a fourth laptop, containing the personal details of more than 14,000 people, had gone missing.

This follows three laptop thefts last week.

So just what is going on at the council?

Who knows?

One aspect is certain however.

It is one thing making an administration error that sees illegally parked motorists refunded, but it is completely another when the names, addresses, dates of birth and even signatures of taxpayers are left on a laptop which is stolen.

Until all the facts are known it will remain quite difficult to criticise or praise the council’s security measures.

We live in a time when thieves are willing to take their chances when the smallest opportunity occurs.

To understand how liable the council is we need to know where the laptops had been left; how long they had been there for and where they were eventually taken from.

In a bid to play the event down the district council’s press office told us that there was a “slight risk” the information could be accessed before telling those who did not know that information such as names and addresses are available on the Electoral Register.

Yes, thanks for the reminder but I think most people are concerned because the list includes 14,673 signatures.

Those whose details have been included on the computers also have a right to ask why their signatures have been stored on a laptop which can be pinched by someone who is being labelled an opportunist thief.

Not a criminal mastermind but some kind of chav who wandered by and liked what he or she saw.

So what do the people of our district think about this latest incident?

Let us take some of the comments that were left on our website after we uploaded the article.

Tory group leader Julian Daly, who must believe all of his Christmases have come early with the parking ticket fiasco and now this, said: “The thief has everything short of bank account details.

“This council is beginning to look accident prone.”

Review reader SBee left the following comment on our website: “Can somebody please advise me what can be done to prevent this confidential info being used as I am probably one of those whose details are on the laptop. I am not very happy to say the least.”

Fellow reader FatBob (his selected name) asks: “How did this opportunistic thief get past security to access the non-public areas in the building?”

And Vanessa adds: “So many agencies have the right to ask and keep confidential information on us and yet seem to lose it all too easily.”

All pertinent points and statements which are worthy of an answer.

Inside the council offices an internal investigation has been launched.

I am sure the taxpayers of St Albans will be eager to know more about its conclusion.

An apology on this issue is a good start, but as many have suggested on our website, those whose details are on the laptop deserve some answers too.


Comments(7)

sbee says...
11:15am Tue 17 Nov 09

I have called the help line this morning and still cannot get any satisfactory explanation let alone an apology. In fact they were totally dismissive of my concerns . I am taking legal advice at the moment.

FatBob says...
11:25am Tue 17 Nov 09

The Civic Centre reception area was expensively re-configured and fitted out a few years ago but one issue not covered is security. There's usually only one (very harrassed) member of staff at the main desk, dealing with phone calls, visitors with an appointment to see someone or for a meeting, callers asking for help and information and people who don't/can't be bothered to understand the ticket allocated queuing system.

It's a piece of cake to walk straight to the lifts which give access to the bomb-proofed basement and the upper floors or just walk up the staircase.

This latest fiasco will at least result in a long-overdue review of security at the council offices and, of course, an increase in the local tax to pay for it.

rceeb says...
1:18pm Tue 17 Nov 09

I see no reason why signatures and this data should be stored on a laptop. their IT policies are a disgrace.
what is more worrying to me is the reference to IT security in the letter from the council. They say the data is not encrypted, but there are 2 levels of 'security'. I suspect 1 level of security is the Windows login - which is useless if the files are on the shared area of the drive. I also suspect the 2nd level of security relates to them logging into the Council VPN (private network), which has no bearing on the laptop files.
This would mean the files are open to anyone who cares to look.

Perhaps Mr. Martin Buhagiar can push the council (and the police) harder on this one on our behalf?

trav1 says...
1:25pm Tue 17 Nov 09

First the Home Office lose my details by letting slip everyone's details who's on Child Benefit, and now this, because I choose a postal vote. Mmmm. ID cards anyone? I'm sure all the information will be safely stored away...

brownr24 says...
1:50pm Tue 17 Nov 09

This under complacency and incompendence of SADC is shocking. I've received the letter this morning and the tone is clearly unhelpful. As a first step SADC should pay for everybody involved to have CIFAS protective registration for a year at £13.80 (www.cifas.org.uk).

RomanBath says...
9:09pm Tue 17 Nov 09

brownr24 wrote:
This under complacency and incompendence of SADC is shocking. I've received the letter this morning and the tone is clearly unhelpful. As a first step SADC should pay for everybody involved to have CIFAS protective registration for a year at £13.80 (www.cifas.org.uk).
I would suggest that everyone involved should register for CIFAS protective registration in the first instance. I would then follow this up by lodging a formal complaint against SADC, using their own complaints procedure, and request that the cost of the CIFAS registration is refunded by the Council. If they won't pay up, let the complaint go through each stage until it reaches the Local Government Ombudsman. (you can't complain to the Omnudsman first). The Ombudsman would have to take notice of flooded with thousands of complaints.

emma3 says...
9:47am Sun 22 Nov 09

It amazes me that public organisations are able to operate in this manner. I work for the private sector and this type of behaviour would just not be acceptable!

I am one of the people affected by this and if I am a victim of fraud as a result of this I fully intend to take the matter further - legally.


julian-daly(pd)47e0611.jpg Tory leader Julian Daly was one of 14, 673 people whose details were stolen.

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses