Columnists RSS Feed


Not the end of the Tesco row

9:38am Wednesday 2nd July 2008

comment Comments (6)   Have your say »


WHAT a difference a week makes. Last Monday night the Alban Arena hosted our Retailer of the Year awards night.

By the end of the night a number of retailers had told me how special the event had made them feel. How great it was that we - by we I mean the Retailer of the Year awards committee - were trying to get people back down the market, back to their bakers, green grocers and butchers.

One week on and the mood had changed more quickly than the crowd at a Gordon Brown lecture on economic stability.

The news that Tesco's proposals have been rejected will no doubt be music to the ears of most independent retailers and those living in or around London Road.

Green campaigners and motorists will, I would imagine, be as pleased as each other as the traffic the supermarket will cause would not be welcomed.

However, in the midst of the joyous scenes I fear a small point was lost.

Will the rejected proposal be enough to make the corporate giant that is Tesco go away? I think not.

This row is still in its early stages and I am not sure we should even expect an official, 100 per cent, cut and dried outcome in 2008.

The supermarket giant has spent a lot of money on these plans. It obviously feels - despite the overwhelming public and council opposition to its proposals - that it has a real chance.

It also believes the store in this location could potentially out-muscle its opponents situated elsewhere, and it has a point.

In the eyes of the applicant and not the objector, the location is possibly as good as it gets.

And let us be brutally honest for minute.

Of those who say they would never set foot in the proposed store, I would guess that less than ten per cent would keep to their word.

With a few good deals and a number of loyalty points on offer, supermarkets can break the promise of the most well-meaning protester.

I expect the appeal to be lodged shortly - what will happen from then onwards is anyone's guess.

However, during last week's awards night, a well-respected guest who knows plenty about the planning world told me: "Expect it to be rejected, then expect Tesco to appeal and then expect it to get what it wants."

THEY say many hands make light work and I certainly thought that was the case last week.

The Retailer of the Year awards evening was a huge success and the Review was and still is delighted to have played its part along with St Albans District Council and St Albans Civic Society.

As I said on the night, the evening was the culmination of one year's hard work for everybody involved and its success certainly made it all worthwhile.

There was a real sense of a community coming together and the interest both before and after the event has been nothing short of remarkable.

The Retailer of the Year committee - which consisted of myself, councillors Roma Mills, Melvyn Teare and Salih Gaygusuz, council officers Charles Baker and Maria Cutler and Eric Roberts from the civic society - certainly had its work cut out, arranging everything from the nominations to the organising of the evening itself. But it was all worthwhile.

I have received a number of calls from shopkeepers and managers asking for tips for next year's event.

One caller even requested a copy of our mystery shopper forms and offered to pay (I may put one on ebay if I get enough interest).

When we set out with this idea in April 2007 we really had no idea how it would conclude.

But the celebrations that greeted each award seemed to indicate that a feel-good-factor of sorts had been returned to retailers in this great city.

I did notice some glum faces from the runners-up but the idea was simply to get people thinking about local traders so hopefully we have all been winners.

Leading up to the event, a couple of mystery shoppers told me that the centre was buzzing with shop keepers, market traders and restauranteurs all waiting in hope and expectation for our shortlist to be published.

During the planning stage I expected the what's in it for you?' questions from the conspiracy theorists but those asking really didn't understand my reply of nothing'.

From the newspaper's point of view the evening was the right conclusion and a new beginning to our Save our Shops campaign.

If some want to believe there was or is an ulterior motive, feel free but it will be back next year and early indications are it will be bigger and better.


Your Say YourSt Albans

Rob Smith, St Albans says...
1:15pm Wed 2 Jul 08

I was pleased to see Tescos application turned down, however, I dont think the council gave a strong enough message to Tesco. Yes the proposed store should have been rejected on traffic and air quality grounds, but the most important reason is the threat to our historic market. St albans market, over a thousand years old, is as much a jewel of the town as the Abbey or the Roman Theatre. Why would we do anyrthing that puts the market in jeopardy? Why would we risk something that makes St Albans special for a Tesco store that we can find in any town. Thats the message we need to get to Tesco - that there is nothing they can do to persuade us to allow them to build thne store.

Simon G, St Albans says...
2:36pm Wed 2 Jul 08

I agree Rob.

I was at the planning meeting and I was dismayed at the way the councillors were flailing around wondering what to do.

Many of their comments were irrelevant and/or incoherent - step forward Cllr Chambers in particular. They seemed to cling to the planning report, and yet also pick holes in it. The report was flawed, and in any case can only be a spring board for the more strategic question that you mention, Rob.

It is essential that the Council gets active to preserve this site for something that will benefit the town, or at least have a neutral effect. If they don't Tesco will just keep coming back until they get what they want.

Lucy, St. Albans says...
5:53pm Wed 2 Jul 08

I was also at the meeting and I have to come back on what was said about the councillors. The councillors who made the decision should be congratulated on the common sense decision which was made.
The councillors are bound to make a decision based purely and only on planning grounds, and this they did following a robust debate and discussion of many, many aspects of the proposal. What you must also remember is that councillors who serve on planning committees are REQUIRED to have received specialist training on the law relating to planning matters and are OBLIGED to reach a decision based on all information available to them on the night.

They were not flailing around as has been commented above. They were questioning as many of the points of evidence as they were allowed to, in order to help reach an informed decision.

In short, those councillors who were required to sit on the stage with lights shining in their eyes as if under interrogation, did a fantastic job, and frankly, would be criticised whatever decision they reached. We should be supporting them on a very difficult job well done and getting behind them for the next stage of the process, rather than attacking their every move.

Liz Needham, St Albans says...
8:49am Thu 3 Jul 08

Well said, Lucy. I thought the Councillors did a good job in difficult circumstances.

Tony, says...
9:44am Thu 3 Jul 08

How difficult was it to agree with a mob? Lets face it, no meaningful debate took place about the merits of the application. Anyone taking a different view would have been shouted down by the mob. Is it just me or does anyone else find it unnerving that decisions can be taken under these circumstances?

Rob Smith, St Albans says...
2:18pm Fri 4 Jul 08

Tony wrote:
How difficult was it to agree with a mob? Lets face it, no meaningful debate took place about the merits of the application. Anyone taking a different view would have been shouted down by the mob. Is it just me or does anyone else find it unnerving that decisions can be taken under these circumstances?
It was a very well behaved mob, if mob is whhat it was. Polite clapping was about as far as it got.

I dont think there was any debate because I dont think there were any convincing arguments from Tesco. Even there man seemed only to say that we really ought to have a Tesco because too many people were going to other shops.

Your sayYourSt Albans

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE St Albans & Harpenden Review account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »