Columnists RSS Feed


Retailer of the Year banner

Is Gaza protest needed in St Albans?


WHILE cutting my teeth as a reporter I used to love covering protests and demonstrations.

People were so emotional, so angry and vociferous. Without wanting to sound unsympathetic, as a journalist, you could not wish for better quotes. The article was always backed up by photographs which gave the reader a clearer picture than was possible to write.

The one that sticks in the mind most is that of Vauxhall workers when I worked on a newspaper in Luton.

Thousands of employees were on the verge of being made redundant as the Vauxhall plant – synonymous with the town for nearly a century – teetered on the brink of closure.

I remember being overawed by the passion of the tens of thousands who demonstrated. You could understand the workers protesting, but they were backed on the streets by people whose grandfather worked at the plant decades ago or by people who simply felt that Vauxhall had made the wrong decision in closing the plant, thus changing the town’s skyline forever.

A few years later I covered a pro and anti-fox hunting demonstration and, by comparison, they seemed pointless.

Not because the cause was any less worthy but because you could tell the “campaigners” were doing it to make themselves feel good, not necessarily because they believed in the cause.

Both protests were impeccably organised.

For example, on the anti-hunt march, boots were handed out to journalists who had worn shoes. Press from all corners of the earth seemed to have been invited, yet the protest itself did nothing and served nobody.

Meanwhile, the newspaper I was working for at the time was not invited to the Vauxhall demonstration – no news crews had been. No meeting point or time was discussed.

But it was all the town was talking about and was covered for weeks by national and local media.

Fast forward to January 17, 2009, and I found myself stuck in traffic in St Albans as “campaigners” “protested” about Israel’s attacks in Gaza.

Let me be clear – I, like most people, have been sickened by what I have seen while watching coverage of the conflict.

As I write this, a ceasefire has been announced, a welcome move, but a move that is sadly too late for hundreds of innocent people.

However, what those protesting hoped to achieve by demonstrating in our city’s civic centre on Saturday is unclear.

Did they want to raise awareness of those affected?

I think not. The conflict has been high up on the agenda of nearly every news organisation in the world.

Maybe they wanted further action from the British Government? I doubt it. Our Government has gone as far as it can in calling for a ceasefire.

Do they want to stop the war? Definitely. But I am fairly sure the protest in St Albans did not have any ramifications in Israel and I doubt Hamas would pay much attention.

So what was the reason?

Campaigner Peter Segal told our reporter: “We wanted to show people of St Albans a substantial number of people care about what’s going on in Gaza and we wanted to show their outrage.”

Does Mr Segal think that anyone not involved in the protest does not care or is any less outraged?

Apparently the demonstration, organised by the St Albans Stop The War Coalition was also open to Muslims, Jews and Christians.

By inviting all faiths I would assume it wanted to protest about the conflict in general, without apportioning blame.

But as I passed by I read such banners as: “Stop slaughter in Gaza from Israel terrorists”, “Stop the war on Gaza”, “Israeli terrorists” etc. If I was Jewish, I am not sure I would feel comfortable attending such an “open to all faiths” protest. As a result there was no mention of Hamas.

So what do these protests achieve?

Other than more animosity I am not sure.

Assaults on Jews in this country are rising. Security staff at Watford Synagogue have been on heightened alert and a synagogue in Willesden was targeted by arsonists last week.

I am not saying peaceful protests like that held in St Albans on Saturday are directly responsible.

However some of the banners on view would certainly stir the blood of young extremists from any faith angling for a fight.

The violence that marred the demonstration outside the Israeli embassy in London was probably started by those who think the Gaza strip is a nightclub in Soho, but when such protests for peace end in more violence on our streets, I see this as a clear indication of what certain campaigners want to see more of.

There is no suggestion of that being the case in St Albans, but there is also no suggestion of there being any reason for such a protest other than to make those involved feel good about themselves.

Meanwhile, placard-waving fanatics can join in stoking the flames burning inside young, impressionable people.

Protests used to be the way in which a democratic society would get together and get something done.

Demonstrations with a clearly-defined message and intention can serve a society so well. But now they seem to be organised at the drop of a hat when the only thing that can be achieved is more bad feeling.

Do we want such issues argued on our streets when we have no involvement? I do not. I just want the conflict to stop.

Comments(6)

Bob S. says...
1:30pm Tue 20 Jan 09


You only have to look at the comments on your own website of just one of those at the protest to gain an understanding of their real motivation:

"If the Jews"
"Jews have killed"
"They have a superiority complex"
"I have nothing against Jewish people as a whole, it just annoys me when I see their actions around the world in general."

If the protestors really cared about what is going on why have they been too busy on each and every day since 2005 to rally against the Gazan government Hams - supported by all sorts of nefarious regimes across the Middle East- firing 6000+ rockets at Israel?

I think we all know the answer.

Bendean says...
3:26pm Tue 20 Jan 09

As suggested above, and also on my previous posts on this event, Mr Segal and his cronies think they have the monopoly on compassion. How dare he say that we all need to be made aware of what happened in Gaza. He obviously has no concept of the horror in Gaza or he woudn't be deluded enough to think that his pathetic coalition march would make any difference to the situation. Obviously hoping the police would not handle the crowd properly and give his motley band an excuse to throw some bricks. As it happened, all he could whinge about was being photographed. Pathetic.

Ed Bailey says...
10:01am Wed 21 Jan 09

“Our Government has gone as far as it can in calling for a ceasefire.” Did it? If Gordon Brown was so anxious to prevent this criminal attack on Gaza, why, the day after the ceasefire did he rush off for a celebratory gala dinner at the Jerusalem home of Israel's prime minister? Ehud Olmert was quoted as saying "Thank you for demonstrating your impressive support for the State of Israel. This is in the supreme interest of all those who fight the forces of evil.’ Among whom he no doubt meant the 450 children killed by Israel over the past three weeks.

Also it’s a non sequitur to take from ‘we held a march to show that a substantial number of people in St Albans care about what’s going on in Gaza’ that Peter Segal means ‘anyone who wasn’t on the march doesn’t care about what’s going on in Gaza’. Deliberately misleading and very sloppy journalism.

DaveBarnes says...
2:30pm Wed 21 Jan 09

What a bizarre article “Is Gaza protest needed in St Albans?” It is hard to think of a more pressing issue that is worthy of getting out on the streets of St Albans to protest about. The fact that this demonstration was so large and organised in only a few days shows that thankfully there are very many more people that think that demonstrating against war and against our government ' s support for the aggressor, is as vital today as it was when we marched against the war in Iraq.

Perhaps Martin believes that 2 million marching against the war in Iraq was not necessary It is however clear that all of these demonstration have put pressure on our government. Tony Blair was forced out because of his lies that took us to war in Iraq. Gordon Brown has had to call for a cease fire in Gaza because of pressure from demonstrations, petitions and decent people making the voices heard.

Not only was last Saturday's demonstration the biggest and most worthwhile St Albans has seen for years, it is also one we may have to repeat. The people of Gaza are still under siege, their borders closed, food scarce, hospitals and schools bombed, and their economy shattered. Our government continues to participate in that siege with ever increasing arms sales to Israel. They must be held to account.

That is why I with many others from St Albans will be protesting on the 4th National demonstration for Gaza this Sat at 2pm congregating at the BBC Broadcasting House Great Portland Place to march on Downing Street

Myrtle Merryweather says...
11:11pm Wed 21 Jan 09

I am a very active campaigner and was in London for the demonstrations there and so wish to respectfully correct a few points made in the COMMENT by Martin Buhagiar. Firstly not "hundreds of innocent people", but one thousand two hundred 40% children have been murdered and over 8000 injured.

Secondly "our govt has gone as far as it can"....No! our govt along with US provides Israel with massive amounts of arms and aid.

And if you don't call the Israeli, US, UK funded bombing of a people surrounded by walls, with no escape, terrorism then I'd like to know what you do call terrorism. Would it be terrorism if a wall was built around an English city for example and then that city was bombed?
There are one and a half million people living in Gaza less human beings than in some of our cities.

I know quite a few Jewish people anyway who disagree with the actions of Israel as I know many English people and Americans who agree that UK/US actions in middle east are illegal terrorist actions. As is Guantanamo Bay and on and on.

I was at the Israeli Embassy on 17th and saw the police actions, two rows of riot police both ends and then squeeze the crowd, into a tight space, children getting crushed into barriers, people shouting for the police to be calm. Batons, charging people for no reason. What would have happened when you were a young man if a group of thugs did that to you and your friends when you had done nothing to deserve it. Might you retaliate- if you want to see police provocation you should attend a demo what about this Saturday? I never resort to violence myself- I want peace-I go actually now to try to calm police and crowd down because with violence comes more excuse for control and less and less freedom. Like 'When banners should be banned' and to give out info to peaceful people about remedies.

Bradley in the Abbey says...
9:57am Thu 22 Jan 09

Dave Barnes: How bizarre to compare this little protest to the march in London. The anti-Iraq march was against our Government, so we could all achieve our aim - to make the Government realise we belived this was wrong. Other than cause traffic misery, what did this pathetic anti-Jewish rally do? It is funny how those present label the Israel Government as terrorists but say nothing about Hamas. Defending a country or firing rockets from mountains are two entirely different things. However, both are wrong, but these protests, as shown by the demo in London, are supported by people who use it to attack Jews. As stated in the article, all this does is stir more hatred against innocent Jews living in this country. Maybe that is what some people involved want.


Anti war campaigners stop traffic Hundreds of people took to the streets on Saturday.

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses