Columnists RSS Feed


Retailer of the Year banner

Review opinion: Anne Main should answer questions


This newspaper does not take sides.

The Review has no political motive and has often criticised the Labour Government; the Liberal Democrat administration at the district council; the Tory-controlled county council, and, of course, Conservative MP Anne Main.

If any step out of line, we believe it is a newspaper’s duty to report the facts and let our readers make up their own minds.

As a result we believe Mrs Main should be held to account for her expenses claims.

After all, we pay the mortgage interest and also paid for the furnishings of her St Albans city centre flat where she and, apparently more regularly, her daughter have lived.

Whether or not she has helped her constituents in the past is irrelevant, that is her job – she is paid to do it.

What is not irrelevant is - what many consider to be - an abuse of Parliament’s expenses system. No doubt she will claim she has stayed within the ‘spirit of the rules’ as most MPs have. She probably did. But it is precisely that point that makes it even harder for her constituents to understand why and how this was allowed to happen.

Mrs Main has hardly spoken to the Review since we published her expenses in our newspaper a fortnight ago. Our calls are going unanswered and we have now been asked to email questions to her, which are also going unanswered. Do you think that is the correct way for your elected MP to act? To talk only to those who nail their political colours to the mast and support her? It makes no difference to us, we will continue to print the facts as we find them.

And what of her Samuel Square flat? Where will the money go when she sells it?

Mrs Main has told us she is in negative equity on the property bought for £249,000 in November 2006.

However an estate agent has told us that it is now worth in the region of £322,000. Minus her £25,000 deposit, that could leave as much as £48,000. Will any profit be returned?

We will seek to get these questions answered and will not patronise our readers by even attempting to suggest that you vote one way or another. But one thing is certain: regardless of her previous work in St Albans as our MP, questions need to be answered and explanations need to be given. Not to those who turn up at Conservative meetings and applaud but to those who currently sit disenchanted with their MP and British politics in general. Over to you Anne.

Comments(6)

JPH007 says...
3:18pm Mon 1 Jun 09

Thank you Review for trying to prise the tigress from her den (or should that be bunker?).

Your arithmetic, however, is as suspect as her expenses - I make the theoretical profit due to the taxpayer on the flat at the moment as £48k (£322k less £249k cost plus £25k personal deposit), but your question is still valid.

An even more pertinent question for her - "Do you agree that your Beaconsfield house lies within the constituency according to the Accommodation Allowance Rule Book and, if so, do you agree that this means that you have made a incorrect claims under this heading for the last four years?

Being upfront about this and making restitution voluntarily for the £60k overclaimed would be a start to her rehabilitation.


Bazster says...
6:33pm Mon 1 Jun 09

Thank goodness The Review has decided to press Ms. Main for answers, particularly in the light of the one-eyed sycophancy being demonstrated by the other local paper.

You are so right about the irrelevance of whether she is doing her job properly. Lots of us do our jobs properly, it's what we get paid a salary for. We neither expect nor deserve the additional perk of being permitted to fiddle our expenses.

But would you please, please, please address the point raised by JPH007. It's very simple. The 2009 rules can be found here:

http://www.parliamen
t.uk/documents/uploa
d/GreenBook.pdf

And the 2006 rules here:

http://www.parliamen
t.uk/documents/uploa
d/HofCpsap.pdf

It's perfectly clear from both that, if you are within 20 miles of the constituency boundary then, for 2nd home purposes, you are in the constituency. Beaconsfield is only about 12 miles from the St Albans constituency boundary.

ArgieBee says...
10:45am Tue 2 Jun 09

Is it possible that Anne's Beaconsfield (being 12 miles from the Bedmond part of the constituency) is her constituency home, but the St Albans flat is her London residence as it is within 20 miles of the Palace of Westminster (about 19.5 miles)?
That would be funny if her London home was in the constituency and constituency home was outside it :O)
But it would show how silly and easily abused the rules are. Apparently she spent 68 nights there in the last year and presumably most nights in Beaconsfield but still claimed the food allowance. She has decided to stop doing this now that we all know.

FatBob says...
12:18pm Tue 2 Jun 09

Very correct and slightly sanctimonious, if I may say.

The editor confidently states:
"This newspaper does not take sides...the Review has no political motive..."

Less than 24 hrs later you have posted a story on the website by scribbler Alex Lewis
"Canvassers hitting St Albans for county and European poll" which has an anti-BNP bias and quotes only one party whose 'activist' Mel Teare is not even a candidate. Is any other party contesting these elections or is it a LibDem shoe-in?

This article contradicts your stated political policy. Where's the balance?

Martin Buhagiar says...
1:37pm Tue 2 Jun 09

Is calling the BNP 'far-right' really anti? As for Cllr Teare's quotes, he was the only councillor available to comment before our deadline.

Bazster says...
4:16pm Tue 2 Jun 09

ArgieBee, you make my head spin! But you have made your point, which is to highlight the stupidity of the rules.

But, it was Anne Main's own party leader who said: "Politicians have done things that are unethical and wrong. I don't care if they were within the rules – they were wrong."

However, he still thinks that all they need to do is to pay back their ill-gotten gains, the morals of the story being (i) it doesn't matter what you do so long as you don't get caught and (ii) if you do get caught, you can get off scot-free if you hand the money back.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses