Columnists RSS Feed


St Albans District Councils planning committee reveals

St Albans District Council’s planning committee is its own worst enemy sometimes.

Less than a week after rejecting proposals for a multi-use games area at Nicholas Breakspear School, the planning policy advisory panel revealed some of the school’s land could soon house 150 new homes.

Funny that.

As the Review revealed last week the planning department recommended the sports pitch proposal should go ahead, yet the planning committee, led by its portfolio holder Chris Brazier, rejected the application.

Reasons given included the added traffic.

Fair enough.

But I cannot help but think that if the already congested Colney Heath Lane cannot cope with another 40 odd cars dropping children to off to play football, how will it manage more homes?

Last Thursday night the Review attended a meeting of the planning policy advisory panel where its chairman, the very same Cllr Brazier, read out a statement confirming Nicholas Breakspear School on a list of greenbelt sites in St Albans still at risk of being developed.

Playing fields by Beaumont School – which also recently had a planning application turned down – is also on the list.

Maybe we now know why the Lib Dem administration wanted to discuss future housing sites behind closed doors.

Whatever the reason, the planning committee and planning policy advisory panel are hardly covering themselves in glory.

And if members of both the panel and committee believe the people of St Albans are so stupid that they cannot to see what is going on, they can think again.

Comments(7)

Vanessa says...
11:43am Tue 2 Nov 10

"You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet" Martin, wait until tonight, when in the face of about 28% cuts in government grants over the next four years resulting in cuts in service, a complete ‘dogs breakfast’ of a restructuring, a 1% hike in interest rates for council borrowing; this cabinet will give the go ahead for a £27m leisure scheme which has far from universal support.

Yes the council, not just the planning committee, is their own worst enemy!

busbee says...
3:06pm Tue 2 Nov 10

Thank you Martin for stating the obvious. Commuters all want to leave for work at the same time, so housing is not an acceptable use for a problem road, unless you improve public transport, in which case it's an even better site for a sports facility!

Snorbs74 says...
3:16pm Tue 2 Nov 10

It amazes me how this planning commitee is still getting away with things like this, time after time they have exposed themselves as at best blithering idiots and at worst self serving political point scorers, yet still they huddle in their little group and make decisions for our district.

Do they even look into things, none of the large sports facilities in the area cause traffic problems. I regularly use Gosling stadium in WGC, Next Generation in Hatfield and Nuffield Health Centre in St Albans, all are busy and none cause traffic problems.

..and after his appauling performance in the London Colney Mosque #2 saga.. you'd think the lib dems would have sent Brazier for some decent acting lessons :)

sportforall says...
4:06pm Tue 2 Nov 10

This whole episode, with Cllr Brazier at the helm has all the hallmarks of a political cover-up. I could say more but the post would be removed. This is the same Cllr Brazier who is now saying that he did not call the Nicky B scheme commercial, the same Cllr Brazier who is now trying to say he did not do a U turn with his previous support for the Nicky B scheme. The same Cllr Brazier who has potentialy lost several hundred thousand pounds of funding for the Nicky B facility. Would you trust this man?

Snorbs74 says...
4:27pm Tue 2 Nov 10

Not with that beard... no

Grower says...
9:23am Wed 3 Nov 10

Hmm The same Council Planning Department that threatens to take tax - payer time consuming and expensive enforcement action against an allotment polytunnel ? Smacks of straining at gnats and swallowing camels don`t you think ?

busbee says...
11:10am Wed 3 Nov 10

This same planning dept made residents pay £100s for an archaeological survey of a 9" free-standing brick garden wall with no hand made bricks in it.

They said it might be 'hiding' a 'Tudor' wall.

Not 'under' but 'behind' it.

When the District Archaeolologist got the report he was so baffled by it that he had to email our structural engineer for advice about it.

Like the residents, he simply could'nt adam-n-eve it.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree