Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting st albans to 80360, or email us
3:27pm Friday 18th December 2009 in Rail Freight News
By Alex Lewis
THE district council has wasted both its own money and Helioslough's by objecting to the railfreight depot on grounds dismissed by the first inspector, Helioslough's barrister has told the inquiry.
Arguing for the company's partial costs claim against the authority, Martin Kingston said that instead of listing 14 reasons for refusal, the council could have limited the area under dispute to the alternative sites assessment.
He said: “The council was determined to refuse the application irrespective of the evidence and the Secretary of State's decision letter.
“That would have led to a much shorter inquiry.
“But it ploughed on regardless.”
The costs application is a 14-page document setting out detailed arguments but no figures.
Helioslough's managing director Simon Hoare told the Review that if the inspector awarded costs against the council the figure would be settled by negotiation.
He said: "I can't estimate a figure at this stage but it's more than a fiver."
Find a job in St Albans and all around Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in St Albans now!
Search Now »
Search for properties all over St Albans and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find used vehicles for sale in St Albans and all over Hertfordshire.
Search Now »
Gary_B says...
3:39pm Fri 18 Dec 09
When did that happen? Last I heard he was a consultant for them.