Report this comment
  • "tonyl - Everyone I know who lives in the area didn't need convincing. They were against it from the start, mainly on the grounds of the traffic congestion it would have caused. The local roads here are stuffed full most of the time during peak hours. Adding thousands of lorries and cars to that would have meant only one thing - total gridlock at peak times.

    I, like many others would like to get more fright off the roads, but wherever it is built, it <b>must</b> have direct access to a motorway."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Railfreight developer's appeal overturned

Railfreight developer's appeal overturned

First published in Rail Freight News St Albans & Harpenden Review: Photograph of the Author by

CAMPAIGNERS have won their fight against the plan to build a massive railfreight depot on a former airfield between London Colney and Park Street.

Although inspector Andy Mead, who heard a six-week inquiry late last year into the controversial project, allowed the appeal by developer Helioslough, he has been overruled by Eric Pickles, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.

Councillor Chris Brazier, district council cabinet member for planning, said: "This is wonderful news. It is a very good thing for the whole of St Albans."

Although Mr Mead was sufficiently convinced by the company's argument to award costs against the council, as well as allowing the appeal, Mr Pickles disagreed, ruling there are other sites for a major goods yard serving the area, in particular Colnbrook near Slough.

The key passage of the decision letter reads: "The Secretary of State is not satisfied that the appraisal of alternative sites has clearly demonstrated that there would be no other suitable location in the north-west sector (of the M25) that would meet the need for an SRFI (strategic rail freight interchange) in the foreseeable future in a significantly less harmful way than the appeal site.

"He therefore disagrees with the inspector’s opinion that it cannot be rationally concluded that the Colnbrook site would meet the needs for an SRFI in a less harmful way than the appeal site."

Councillor Brazier said: "Helioslough may go to the High Court and try to argue that the Secretary of State should not have overruled the inspector, but I would hope that the reason given is sufficiently robust to defeat that."

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree